“Digitale Teilhabe für alle” (digital participation for everyone) was the theme of last week’s Volkshochschultag 2016, an international conference convened in Berlin by the German Adult Education Association (DVV) to explore the impact and consequences of the increasing use of digital technologies in education around the world, especially as they relate to equity and inclusion. “Does digitisation provide an opportunity for educational justice or does it strengthen the unequal access to education even more?” This question (which admittedly flows off the tongue a little better in German than it does in English) animated a related debate (in which I participated) on the last day of the conference.
In support of my pithy, one word response to this question (an enthusiastic and deliberately argumentative ja!), I drew heavily on the 2016 World Development Report, which the World Bank released earlier this year. This widely read, ‘flagship’ annual World Bank publication explores a topic of broad relevance in the fields of international development and development economics. The 2016 report, Digital Dividends [pdf, 10.8mb), examines the impact that the Internet and mobile networks are having (and not having) around the world.
As a primer on the uses of ‘informational and communication technologies for development’ (what’s known as ‘ICT4D’ by those in related fields who like acronyms), the 2016 World Development Report is quite comprehensive. Surveying and exploring how ICTs are impacting fields such as agriculture, finance, government services, education, energy, the environment and healthcare (and many others), ‘Digital Dividends’ is a World Bank report written for people who don’t normally read (or perhaps even care about) World Bank reports.
It is relatively catholic in its worldview, although not surprisingly there is a decided focus on things the Bank cares about (e.g. economic growth, jobs), but thankfully in language a bit more accessible than what one often finds in publications put out by an institution which employs over 1,000 PhD economists. Happily, there’s not a single mention of a ‘production function’, for example; and I really like the cover!
But I don’t mean to ‘bury the lede’, as journalists say. Here, quickly, are the main messages from the 2016 World Development Report:
- Digital technologies can be transformational (no surprise there, but …)
- Benefits often remain unrealized (indeed …)
- The digital divide is still wide open (and it is important to acknowledge that …)
- The largest barriers are not in technology (and that …)
- The digital revolution needs a strong analog foundation
While there’s nothing particularly subversive in these findings (that’s not the role of something like the World Development Report), the authors are pretty clear in conveying one general, overarching point, which the official related press release summarizes quite succinctly:
“The benefits of rapid digital expansion have been skewed towards the wealthy, skilled, and influential around the world, who are better positioned to take advantage of the new technologies.”
Over the course of 330 information-dense pages (which include 74 boxes, 142 charts and figures, 14 maps and 29 tables), the authors document and examine what this ‘digital expansion’ looks like in practice, with lots of specifics. In few other publications will you find details about such varied topics as the sequencing of e-health development in Montenegro, evidence of internet content filtering around the world, spectrum assignment in Latin America (in MHz blocks), or African tech hubs.
For those with a specific interest in education, there is much here to consider. The report itself has a short section on education, a much longer one on ‘skills’, and brief highlights about a number of initiatives and trends (MOOCs, Khan Academy, Rio’s Educopédia, One Laptop per Child) that are enabled by education technologies.
More fundamentally, though, considering the report as a whole, it is clear that education is one of the central connective themes that sits at the heart of what the 2016 World Development Report is about, and its relevance for decisionmakers going forward. Digital Dividends calls for the “strengthening the analog foundation of the digital revolution.” Going forward, development success will not be so much about technological advances (which will no doubt continue to occur, at an increasingly dizzying rate, in all sorts of exciting ways), it argues, but rather as a result of success with two things: policies and people.
The report states (see figure 3.17, for those who like citations) that “digital technology projects funded by the World Bank are more successful in countries with higher-quality institutions.” This perhaps shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone, but it highlights that beliefs about technology being a simple ‘silver bullet solution’ to so many of the most pressing challenges facing communities around the world today are misguided. As the historian Melvin Kranzberg observed (and as Kentaro Toyama likes to remind me), “technology is neither positive nor negative – nor is it neutral.”
Those most likely to benefit the most from the emergence and use of new technologies are those already advantaged in many ways. This isn’t to contend that advances will only accrue to such groups – certainly not!
New technologies will continue to emerge that offer exciting potential applications to help address many long standing ‘problems’ around the world (and along the way introduce a few new ones, presumably). Recommendations such as those found in the 2016 World Development Report about “making the internet universal, affordable, open, and safe” can be important guiding principles in ensuring that these technologies can be utilized to their full potential.
However, we face a “changed world with unchanged classrooms,” and it is the young people who emerge from such classrooms, together with those who continue to learn after their formal schooling has ended, who will chart the course forward. They may increasingly be aided by algorithms, and some of the roles they would have performed in the past may be performed by machines in the future. However, in the end, it is the extent to which our educators and education systems are able to support and nurture the development of the analogue foundation of our increasingly our digital lives that will be critical.
That’s the real challenge if the ‘digital dividends’ analyzed and celebrated in the 2016 World Development Report are to realized — not only for the ‘elites’ in economies and societies around the world, but rather for and by allcitizens, no matter where they may live and the circumstances into which they were born.
You may also be interested in the following posts from the EduTech blog:
- The Second Digital Divide
- Worst practice in ICT use in education
- The Matthew Effect in Educational Technology
- 10 principles to consider when introducing ICTs into remote, low-income educational environments
- Promising uses of technology in education in poor, rural and isolated communities around the world
Thanks again to DVV International, the Institute for International Cooperation of the Deutscher Volkshochschul-Verband e.V. (DVV-International), for inviting me to participate in Volkshochschultag 2016. Note that a version of this post originally ran on the main World Bank education blog to coincide with the release of the 2016 World Development Report.
Note: The image used at the top of this blog post of a section of the Berlin Wall at Friedrichstrasse in East Berlin in 1990 (“tearing down, or reinforcing, longstanding divides?”) comes from the Wikipedian Bengt Larsson via Wikimedia Commons and is used according to the terms of its Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.